The acclaimed documentarian is now considered beyond being a historical storyteller; he is a brand, a prolific creative force. When he has project arriving on the small screen, everybody wants an interview.
He participated in “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he says, approaching the conclusion of nine-month promotional tour that included numerous locations, dozens of preview events and hundreds of interviews. “I think there are 340.1m podcasts, one for every American, and I’ve done half of them.”
Thankfully the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, equally articulate in interviews as he is accomplished in the editing room. The 72-year-old has traveled from Monticello to mainstream media outlets to discuss one of his most ambitious projects: this historical epic, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that dominated ten years of his career and arrived currently on PBS.
Similar to traditional cooking in today’s rapid-consumption era, The American Revolution proudly conventional, more redolent of The World at War rather than contemporary online content and podcast series.
But for Burns, whose professional life chronicling strands of US history including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, the revolutionary period transcends ordinary historical coverage but essential. “I said this to my co-director Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: this represents our most significant project Burns states by phone from New York.
Burns and his collaborators plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward drew upon thousands of books and other historical materials. Numerous scholars, covering various ideological backgrounds, offered expert analysis along with leading scholars representing multiple disciplines such as enslavement studies, indigenous peoples’ narratives and the British empire.
The film’s approach will appear similar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. The characteristic technique incorporated gradual camera movements across still photos, extensive employment of contemporary scores and actors reading diaries, letters and speeches.
Those projects established Burns built his legacy; years later, presently the respected veteran of historical films, he seems able to recruit any actor he chooses. Collaborating with the filmmaker at a New York gathering, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”
The lengthy creation process provided advantages concerning availability. Filming occurred in studios, at historical sites and remotely via Zoom, a method utilized amid COVID restrictions. Burns explains the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who made time in Atlanta to voice his character as the revolutionary leader prior to departing to subsequent commitments.
The cast includes numerous acclaimed actors, respected performing veterans, emerging and established stars, Tom Hanks, Ethan Hawke, Maya Hawke, accomplished dramatic artists, Damian Lewis, Laura Linney, Tobias Menzies, versatile character actors, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, and many others.
Burns emphasizes: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast recruited for any project. They do an extraordinary service. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I became frustrated when someone asked, regarding the famous participants. I go, ‘These are actors.’ They represent global acting excellence and they can bring this stuff alive.”
However, the lack of surviving participants, modern media compelled the production to rely extensively on the written word, weaving together the first-person voices of numerous historical characters. This allowed them to show spectators beyond the prominent leaders of that era but also to “dozens of others crucial to understanding, numerous individuals never even had a portrait painted.
Burns also indulged his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “I have great affection for cartography,” he observes, “and there are more maps throughout this series versus earlier productions across my complete filmography.”
Filmmakers captured footage at numerous significant sites in various American regions plus English locations to capture the landscape’s character and worked extensively with historical interpreters. Various aspects converge to depict events more violent, complex and globally significant compared to standard education.
The documentary argues, was no mere parochial quarrel about property, revenue and governance. Rather, the series depicts a blood-soaked struggle that finally engaged more than two dozen nations and unexpectedly manifested what it calls “humanity’s highest ideals”.
What had begun as a jumble of grievances aimed at the crown by American colonists in 13 fractious colonies soon descended into a vicious internal war, pitting family members against each other and creating local enmities. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The main misapprehension concerning independence struggle involves believing it represented a consolidating event for colonists. This omits the fact that Americans fought each other.”
According to his perspective, the revolution is a story that “for most of us is drowning in sentimentality and wistful remembrance and is incredibly superficial and doesn’t have the respect the historical reality, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”
The historian argues, an uprising that declared the transformative concept of the unalienable rights of people; a brutal civil war, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, continuing previous patterns of struggles among European powers for dominance in the New World.
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the