While he arrived at the Parisian detention facility on Tuesday, Nicolas Sarkozy posted a declaration overflowing with opposition via social media, asserting, "It's not a former president of the republic entering prison today, but rather an innocent man." An appellate court will in time give its view the veracity of his claim. But unfortunately for the ex-president, the drama and significance of his decline cannot be ignored.
President of France during the 2007-2012 term, Mr Sarkozy was convicted of unlawful plotting to acquire illicit campaign funds from the government of the former Libyan ruler, Muammar Gaddafi. Given a half-decade incarceration, he has become the first former leader of an European Union nation to enter prison, and the initial French president since the disgraced head of the Vichy regime, the Vichy leader. In a country where the chosen leader possesses a almost king-like position, Tuesday's remarkable event was a historic occasion.
In an era when confidence in political systems in France has collapsed to the degree where the lights are flashing red, it was also a salutary demonstration that the law applies to all. In a poll issued on Tuesday, two-thirds of respondents indicated that they felt a large number of politicians were corrupt, and the vast majority said that most operated primarily out of self-interest. When convicting Mr Sarkozy and ordering that his prison term should begin without delay, the presiding magistrate, the judicial authority, said that she took into account both the profoundly severe aspect of the crimes and the fact that they were "likely to undermine the people's faith."
Those thoughts might be seen as ordinary, especially given that Mr Sarkozy has in the past been sentenced in distinct bribery proceedings. But the legal proceedings and its fallout have alarmingly revealed the extent to which within the nation, as in various states, the judicial framework is endangered by a increasingly common disdain for courts and the attempted manipulation of the popular view.
Following a populist playbook, an thorough and detailed court case has been falsely depicted by his backers as a courtroom scheme and political retaliation. Subsequent to the decision last month, the ex-leader openly condemned his sentence as unlawful and censured the "hostility" with "no boundaries" that allegedly motivated it. As senior politicians and backers from the conservative and extremist have filled the airwaves and conservative press with the same talking points, Ms Gavarino has been subjected to various menaces.
Reassuringly, the citizens seems unconvinced. Research following the judgment found significant majorities endorsing both the proceedings of the legal case and his punishment. But the spectacle, and the obvious try to weaken the standing of the legal system, was most probably merely a dress rehearsal. In January, Marine Le Pen's legal challenge against a conviction for diversion of electoral finances will occur. If unsuccessful, the conservative figure will be excluded from participating in the 2027 presidential race.
In a polarised and mistrustful nation, that will be a perilous moment for the French judiciary to handle. Mr Sarkozy may yet be released before his own appeal, subsequent to a petition by his legal team. Yet the irresponsible and baseless attacks on the judicial framework throughout his trial have set a damaging precedent.